Ask most Christians to name a sin, and the mind often supplies a visible transgression. Theft. Adultery. False witness. The imagination gravitates to sins of commission, deeds that actively transgress the revealed will of God. Yet Scripture also exposes a subtler moral failure. It is the sin of omission, the culpable absence of the good we know we ought to do, the neglected mercy, the withheld obedience, the truth unsaid, the love unfurnished. The tradition of the Church has long confessed both kinds of sins. The Apostles’ moral instruction assumes them. The Lord Jesus condemns not only harmful acts but also fruitlessness, inertia, and negligent love.
The Letter of James offers a particularly sharp lens for seeing omission. Two texts are pivotal. James 2:10 establishes the indivisible integrity of God’s Law: “For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it” (James 2:10, ESV). James 4:7 addresses the obedient posture that prevents omission and empowers commission of the good: “Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you” (James 4:7, ESV). Together, these passages expose why omissions matter and how grace trains believers to refuse negligence and embrace active righteousness. Because James also states the principle directly in the same chapter, we will draw in James 4:17 as a clarifying witness: “So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin” (ESV). James 4:17 names the category; James 2:10 and 4:7 supply the theological ground and the sanctifying remedy.
What follows is an exegetical and theological exploration of these texts, with special attention to the original language, the canonical context, and concrete pathways for faithful practice. The goal is not mere information but transformation, so that, by the Spirit, believers may “be doers of the word, and not hearers only” (James 1:22, ESV).
Defining the Sin of Omission
Moral theology distinguishes between sins of commission and sins of omission. A sin of commission perpetrates the evil that God forbids. A sin of omission withholds the good that God commands. Both violate love of God and neighbor; both incur real guilt. Scripture already articulates this distinction. The Book of Proverbs warns, “Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your power to do it” (Proverbs 3:27, ESV). Our Lord identifies omission with devastating clarity in the parable of the sheep and the goats, where the condemned are judged precisely for the good they did not do for “the least of these” (see Matthew 25:41–45, ESV). James 4:17 therefore does not introduce a novelty but crystallizes a Biblical reality.
Yet James 2:10 and 4:7 demonstrate that omission is not a marginal infraction. It strikes at the unity of God’s Law and the posture of the believer before God. Omission is not only failing to do some incidental good. It is a failure to love, a breach in wholehearted devotion, a fracture in the integrity of obedience, and therefore a serious matter that must be confessed and mortified.
James 2:10 and the Integrity of the Law
The Text in Context
James 2 addresses partiality in the assembly. Wealthy visitors receive honor; the poor are shamed. James indicts such favoritism as inconsistent with “the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory” (James 2:1, ESV) and contrary to the “royal law according to the Scripture, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself’” (James 2:8, ESV). The argument reaches a decisive maxim in 2:10: “For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it” (ESV). Verses 11–13 unpack the maxim, emphasizing that the one Lawgiver is the one who spoke all commandments, and that authentic obedience must be comprehensive, merciful, and free from partiality.
Key Greek Terms and Syntax
James 2:10 reads in Greek: Ὅστις γὰρ ὅλον τὸν νόμον τηρήσῃ, πταίσει δὲ ἐν ἑνί, γέγονεν πάντων ἔνοχος.
Several terms are crucial.
ὅλον τὸν νόμον (holon ton nomon): “the whole law.” The phrase underscores the unity and totality of the divine will. The Law is not a buffet but an indivisible expression of the character of God. As James will say in verse 11, the same God who said “Do not commit adultery” said “Do not murder.” The unity of authorship grounds the unity of obligation.
τηρήσῃ (tērēsē): aorist subjunctive of τηρέω (tēreō), “to keep,” “to guard,” “to observe.” The verb evokes faithful custody of what God has commanded. The nuance is not merely external compliance but careful observance. In Johannine usage, tēreō often connotes loving obedience to Jesus’ word; James employs a similar moral texture.
πταίσει (ptaisē): aorist subjunctive of πταίω (ptaiō), “to stumble,” “to trip.” The metaphor suggests an unsteady misstep, a lapse that nevertheless constitutes a real fall. James uses ptaiō elsewhere regarding speech failure (James 3:2). Here, the point is not the trivialization of the offense but the acknowledgment that even a single stumble counts.
ἐν ἑνί (en heni): “in one [point].” The prepositional phrase is intentionally modest. James does not concede habitual rebellion. He specifies even one point. The focus falls on the indivisible integrity of obedience rather than on the gravity of one command over another.
γέγονεν πάντων ἔνοχος (gegonen pantōn enochos): perfect of γίγνομαι with the predicate ἔνοχος (enochos), “liable,” “guilty,” “answerable.” The perfect tense form suggests a present state resulting from a past act: the person has become and remains liable to the whole. The phrase does not mean that the offender has broken every command in content. It asserts liability to the one Lawgiver and to the whole economy of His will.
Theological Force
James does not argue for a perfectionistic legalism that erases the Gospel. He articulates the moral unity of God’s will so that believers will abandon selective obedience. Partiality toward the wealthy is not a minor social faux pas. It is a failure to love, a breach of the “royal law,” and thus a culpable omission. The sin here is as much what the community failed to do as what they did. They failed to honor the poor as neighbors, failed to extend mercy, failed to enact the impartial love of God. The maxim of 2:10 presses this point home. If one “stumbles in one point,” that person stands liable because our preferences cannot partition obedience. The law’s telos is love, and love is indivisible.
James confirms this in 2:12–13: “So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment” (ESV). The “law of liberty” is the Gospel-shaped instruction of the Messiah that frees and binds believers to love. Omission of mercy betrays that law. Therefore, the sin of omission is not a small crack at the edges but a fissure at the center of Christian obedience.
Omission as Failure of Love
Because James 2 deals with partiality, it displays omission in social form. The assembly neglects the poor. They do not take overt malicious action against them. They simply leave love undone. In terms of 2:10, they “stumble” at the point of mercy. In terms of 2:8, they fail to fulfill the “royal law.” This failure triggers the liability state captured by enochos. The guilt is real because the omission is a refusal of God’s own character, who “has chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith” (James 2:5, ESV) and who, in the Lord Jesus, has drawn near to the lowly.
Thus, James 2:10 helps believers name omissions for what they are. They are not morally neutral gaps. They are failures of love before the one Lawgiver who commands the whole. They place us under judgment apart from mercy. Only divine mercy, welcomed and extended, can triumph over such judgment.
James 4:7 and the Posture that Prevents Omission
The Text in Context
James 4 diagnoses quarrels and worldliness within the community. Desires wage war; prayers are compromised; friendship with the world is enmity with God. Into this maelstrom of divided loyalties, James announces grace and issues a cluster of imperatives that map the path of repentance and restoration. The heart of the summons appears in 4:7: “Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you” (ESV). The surrounding imperatives reinforce the posture: “Draw near to God,” “Cleanse your hands,” “Purify your hearts,” “Humble yourselves” (James 4:8–10, ESV).
Key Greek Terms and Syntax
James 4:7 reads: Ὑποτάγητε οὖν τῷ Θεῷ· ἀντίστητε δὲ τῷ διαβόλῳ, καὶ φεύξεται ἀφ’ ὑμῶν.
Ὑποτάγητε (hypotagēte): aorist imperative, second plural, of ὑποτάσσω (hypotassō), “to subject oneself,” “to place oneself under.” In the middle or passive voice, as here, the nuance is voluntary, willing submission. The imperative calls for decisive reorientation of allegiance under God’s royal authority.
ἀντίστητε (antistēte): aorist imperative of ἀνθίστημι (anthistēmi), “to stand against,” “to resist.” The term is combative yet defensive. The believer is not commanded to chase the devil but to stand firm against his devices.
τῷ διαβόλῳ (tō diabolō): “the devil,” the accuser and slanderer, the personal adversary who seeks to exploit desires and sow double-mindedness.
φεύξεται (pheuxetai): future of φεύγω (pheugō), “to flee.” The promise is not that temptation never recurs, but that resistance in submission to God causes the tempter to retreat.
The order of the imperatives is essential. Submission to God precedes resistance to the devil. Without the former, the latter collapses. Submission also prevents omissions because it positions the believer in active obedience, ready to do the will of God and thereby close the gaps where negligence would otherwise take root.
Theological Force
How does 4:7 address omission? First, omission arises wherever the self remains unsubmitted. The heart cherishes autonomy, delays obedience, and withholds love. Submission is the spiritual posture that dissolves the illusion of autonomy and answers God with a ready “Yes.” Second, omission thrives when the accuser persuades us that neutrality is possible. James does not allow such neutrality. One either submits to God or accommodates the enemy. Resistance to the devil is an active stance. If we fail to resist, we have effectively yielded. Omission here is not passive innocence. It is capitulation by negligence.
James 4:8–10 reinforces the point. “Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you” (ESV). Omission often masquerades as busyness or distraction. Drawing near demands intentionality. The double-minded must purify hearts and hands. The frivolous must mourn and weep over sin. The proud must be humbled. These imperatives dismantle the interior conditions that breed omission and replace them with a humble alacrity for obedience.
James 4:17 as the Explicit Principle of Omission
Although our focus is on James 2:10 and 4:7, James 4:17 must be heard alongside them: “So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin” (ESV). The syntax is starkly simple. εἰδόντι (eidonti), a dative participle of οἶδα (oida), signifies known moral insight. καλὸν ποιεῖν (kalon poiein) denotes “the good to do.” μὴ ποιοῦντι (mē poiounti), a negative dative participle of ποιέω (poieō), marks the failure to enact the known good. The predicate ἁμαρτία (hamartia), “sin,” names the result.
James grounds culpability in knowledge. This does not absolve ignorance where it is culpable, for Scripture also addresses negligent ignorance. Rather, James aims to block a self-justifying refuge. We commonly know far more than we enact. When knowledge of the good meets failure to do it, omission becomes explicit sin.
This verse integrates perfectly with 2:10 and 4:7. The unity of the Law in 2:10 supplies the moral seriousness; the submissive posture of 4:7 supplies the sanctifying means; 4:17 supplies the explicit category. The believer who submits to God will not, as a matter of life, leave the known good undone.
Scriptural Witness of Omission Across Scripture
The Biblical canon supplies abundant examples of omission, which illuminate James’s concern.
The Good Samaritan. The priest and Levite in Jesus’ parable do not strike the wounded man. They pass by. Their omission violates the royal law of neighbor love. The Samaritan “showed him mercy” (Luke 10:37, ESV); the others withheld it.
The Burying of the Talent. In the parable of the talents, the servant condemned as “wicked and slothful” is judged not for embezzlement but for inaction. He knew his master’s expectation and did not act accordingly (see Matthew 25:24–30, ESV). Omission is the plot of the parable.
The Least of These. The goats in Matthew 25 are condemned for what they did not do: “as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me” (Matthew 25:45, ESV).
Proverbs and the Prophets. Wisdom commands active benevolence: “Rescue those who are being taken away to death” (Proverbs 24:11, ESV). Isaiah 58 rebukes a fasting that omits justice and mercy. Neglect is judged as seriously as oppression.
David’s Neglect. In the narrative of 2 Samuel 11, David’s infamous sins of commission are preceded by a suggestive omission: he remained in Jerusalem “at the time when kings go out to battle” (2 Samuel 11:1, ESV). The king failed to fulfill his vocation, and the omission became a seedbed for further sin.
These texts confirm James’s teaching. Omission is failure to love, failure to act in faith, failure to obey. It is not morally neutral. It is culpable. It demands repentance and reform.
How Omission Works
Moral Knowledge, Agency, and Accountability
James frames omission in terms of known good and enacted good. Three elements stand out.
Knowledge. The Biblical vision assumes that believers can know the good through the Word and Spirit. This knowledge is not exhaustive comprehension but practical discernment sufficient for obedience.
Agency. James presumes that believers can act, by grace, in ways that align with God’s will. Submission to God and resistance to the devil are not abstractions. They are practical stances.
Accountability. Because the Law is one and the Lawgiver is one, believers are accountable for the whole shape of love, not selective fragments. Selective obedience is a disguised form of disobedience.
The Inner Ecology of Omission
Omission often arises from an ecology of the heart rather than from a single decision. James 4 diagnoses friendship with the world, passions that war within, and pride. These conditions dull attention to the neighbor and excuse delay. The remedy is comprehensive: humility, nearness to God, cleansing of hands, purification of heart, lament over sin, and persevering resistance. Omission is not solved by a mere checklist. It is addressed by a reordered heart and reordered loves.
Corporate Dimensions
James addresses the assembly. Omissions can be corporate. A Church can omit the poor, omit intercessory prayer, omit catechesis, omit discipline, omit evangelism, omit hospitality. The “law of liberty” has an ecclesial horizon. Communities must ask not only what evils they avoid but what goods they lovingly and consistently do in obedience to the Lord Jesus.
Recognizing Omissions
In the spirit of James’s directness, consider diagnostic questions that arise from his argument.
Where do I selectively obey? If there are spheres where obedience is eager and others where it is perpetually deferred, the unity of the Law is being denied in practice.
Where do I minimize mercy? Because James binds mercy to the “law of liberty,” chronic withholding of mercy signals a failure to live under that law.
Where do I delay the known good? Repeated postponement of clearly known duties is a functional denial of James 4:17.
Where am I unsubmitted? Patterns of autonomy, self-assertion, or habitual excuse-making are signs that James 4:7 has not yet set the posture of the heart.
Where do I fail to resist? If certain temptations meet no resistance, omission is already at work, for neglecting to resist is itself yielding ground.
The purpose of such questions is not self-accusation detached from grace. The purpose is clarity that leads to repentance and renewed obedience under grace.
Grace for Omissions - The Gospel Frame
James 4:6 anchors everything: “But he gives more grace.” The correction of omission is not moralism. It is sanctification by grace. The Lord who commands submission supplies grace to the humble. The Savior whose obedience fulfills the Law imputes righteousness and empowers obedience by the Spirit. The “law of liberty” is Gospel-shaped precisely because the Gospel frees us to love. The believer’s confession, therefore, can be honest and unafraid. We may admit, with James, that failure in one point renders us liable, and we may flee to the mercy that triumphs over judgment.
The cross is the decisive word over omissions as well as commissions. Christ has borne the guilt of what we have done and what we have left undone. United to Him, we now “walk in newness of life” (Romans 6:4, ESV). Grace does not license passivity. Grace energizes action. As Paul testifies, “by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary, I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me” (1 Corinthians 15:10, ESV). Grace that is “not in vain” becomes visible as the good long omitted is now joyfully done.
Word Studies for Preaching and Practice
A brief lexical synthesis can strengthen teaching and discipleship.
ἁμαρτία (hamartia, sin). Not only missing a mark in the sense of a target, but alienation from God’s will that expresses itself in both wrongful acts and withheld goods. James 4:17 names omission a species of hamartia.
νόμος (nomos, law). In James, the Law is the moral will of God fulfilled and transfigured in Christ, called “the perfect law, the law of liberty” (James 1:25, ESV; 2:12, ESV). The unity of the nomos in 2:10 defeats selective obedience.
πταίω (ptaiō, stumble). Suggests moral instability that can manifest as omission or commission. The remedy is not self-reliance but humble submission and prayer for wisdom (James 1:5–6, ESV).
ἔνοχος (enochos, liable). Carries legal weight. The one who omits is answerable to the Lawgiver. This gravity leads to grace, because only God who judges can also justify.
ὑποτάσσω (hypotassō, submit). A decisive alignment under God’s kingship, the spiritual opposite of omission’s autonomy.
ἀνθίστημι (anthistēmi, resist). Active moral steadfastness. In Ephesians 6 Paul will call it “stand” language. James compresses it into the decisive act of resistance that causes the adversary to flee.
οἶδα (oida, to know) and ποιέω (poieō, to do). The knowledge–action pair in 4:17 is crucial. Spiritual maturity is the alignment of oida and poieō under grace.
ἔλεος (eleos, mercy). While not explicit in 2:10, it saturates 2:12–13. Mercy enacted is the antithesis of omission in the sphere of neighbor love.
These words help preachers and teachers move congregations beyond vague sentiment to concrete repentance and habits of obedience.
Everyday Patterns
Because omission is subtle, examples illuminate.
Prayerlessness. The Lord commands, “pray without ceasing” (1 Thessalonians 5:17, ESV). Chronic neglect of prayer is not merely a missed opportunity but a failure to obey, a functional declaration of self-sufficiency.
Withholding Reconciliation. Jesus commands reconciliation prior to worship (see Matthew 5:23–24, ESV). Delaying peacemaking when it is within our power is an omission.
Silence in Witness. The Great Commission commands disciple-making (Matthew 28:19, ESV). Habitual silence about Christ when the Spirit prompts is omission.
Neglect of the Poor. “Only, they asked us to remember the poor” (Galatians 2:10, ESV). Refusing material generosity when able is an omission.
Failure to Honor Parents. “Honor your father and your mother” (Exodus 20:12, ESV). Withholding care and respect is an omission that can masquerade as neutrality.
Lit Light Hidden. “Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket” (Matthew 5:15, ESV). Refusing to let one’s light shine through good works is an omission.
Each example is not intended to burden consciences with scrupulosity but to sharpen perception so that grace may train us to “devote themselves to good works” (Titus 3:8, ESV).
How to Unlearn Omission
James’s imperatives suggest a pastoral pathway. The following practices, undertaken by grace, cultivate a life that resists omission.
Daily Submission. Begin each day with explicit self-yielding to God. Pray James 4:7-10. Confess that the day is not your own. Ask the Spirit to reveal the good prepared for you to do “that you should walk in them” (Ephesians 2:10, ESV).
The Prayer of Examen. In the evening, review the day under the light of the Spirit. Where did you know the good and fail to do it. Confess specifically, receive mercy, and plan concrete acts of repair where possible.
Mercy Prompts. Ask God each morning for one neighbor-love assignment. Then be attentive to the Spirit’s nudge. When the nudge comes, act promptly. Delay is the breeding ground of omission.
Rule of Life. Establish rhythms that make obedience ordinary. Commit to regular Scripture reading, intercessory prayer, gathered worship with the Church, hospitality, and almsgiving. Structure resists omission by steadying attention and love.
Accountability. Share with a mature believer where omission most tempts you. Request questions that will draw omissions into the light. Pray together for courage.
Corporate Confession. Many historic liturgies confess “what we have done and what we have left undone.” Use such prayers faithfully. Let them shape your moral imagination and humility.
Sabbath Attentiveness. In rest, ask the Lord to reorder desires. Omission often flows from disordered priorities. Sabbath re-centers life on God and neighbor.
Small, Swift Obediences. Practice immediacy in small goods. A swift text of encouragement, a quick prayer, a short visit, a spontaneous gift. Such habits train the heart to say “Yes” before analysis creates excuses.
Learning to Lament. James commands, “Be wretched and mourn and weep” (James 4:9, ESV). Healthy lament over omission softens the heart and fuels compassionate action.
Meditation on Mercy. Regularly meditate on the mercy you have received. Those who are freshly amazed by mercy become instruments through whom “mercy triumphs over judgment” (James 2:13, ESV).
Anticipating Objections
Two objections often surface.
“Will this not lead to performance anxiety.” James embeds his commands in grace. “He gives more grace” (James 4:6, ESV). The answer to anxiety is not to lower the moral bar but to magnify grace. Grace precedes, empowers, and restores. The “law of liberty” liberates the will to love.
“Is every failure equally grievous?” James 2:10 addresses the unity of the Law, not the uniformity of consequences. Scripture elsewhere distinguishes the weights and consequences of sins. Yet the point remains. Omission is sin because it violates love. Therefore, it belongs in confession and discipleship, and it requires the same Savior who bore both our acts and our neglect.
A Homiletical Outline for James 2:10 and 4:7
For pastors and teachers, the following structure can guide proclamation.
Thesis: Because God’s Law is one and God’s grace is abundant, the sin of omission must be confessed and forsaken, and believers must adopt the posture of submission that overcomes negligence.
Text 1: James 2:10 in the context of partiality. Word study on ptaiō, enochos, nomos. Show omission as failure of mercy.
Text 2: James 4:7 in the context of worldliness. Word study on hypotassō, anthistēmi, pheugō. Show submission as an antidote to omission.
Text 3: James 4:17 as the explicit principle. Word study on oida, kalon, poieō, hamartia.
Illustrations: Good Samaritan, Least of These, Burying the Talent.
Gospel: “He gives more grace.” Christ fulfills the Law, bears our omissions, pours out the Spirit.
Practices: Examen, mercy prompts, rule of life, accountability.
Call: Draw near to God; act promptly in the good you know today.
The Freedom of Doing the Good We Know
James refuses to flatter believers with a truncated vision of holiness. Selective obedience will not do. The Law is one because God is one. To withhold the good is to “stumble,” and to stumble is to be liable before the Lawgiver. Yet James also refuses despair. “But he gives more grace” (James 4:6, ESV). The summons is clear and gracious: “Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you” (James 4:7, ESV). Far from a call to anxious striving, this is a call to liberty, the liberty of those who know that in Christ the yoke is easy and the burden is light. It is the liberty of those who draw near to God and find Him drawing near, cleansing hands, purifying hearts, and lifting the humble.
Therefore, let us repent of omission: of prayers unsaid, mercies unoffered, witness withheld, hospitality postponed, injustices unchallenged, neighbors unserved. Let us confess with candor where we have “failed in one point” and thereby denied the unity of love. Let us receive mercy that triumphs over judgment. Let us then go and do the good we already know, today, trusting that the God of all grace will give more grace, and that as we resist the devil, he will flee, and as we submit to God, He will exalt the humble in due time.
May the Lord, through His Word and Spirit, make us not hearers only but doers, so that our faith will be living and active, our love will be impartial and merciful, and our lives will, by grace, display the beauty of the Gospel to the glory of God the Father.
No comments:
Post a Comment