The stories found in Genesis surrounding the use of Maidservants or female servants as surrogates for bearing children is one of the most fascinating and complex topics in the entire Bible. The practice is exemplified in two key passages, Genesis 16:1-3 which details the story of Abram, Sarai, and Hagar, and Genesis 29:31-30:24 which records the family dynamics between Jacob, Leah, Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah. On the surface, these accounts seem to simply retell events as they occurred in the lives of the patriarchs. However, a deeper theological and cultural analysis reveals profound truths about the ancient Israelite understanding of marriage, childbearing, and God's covenant promises.
It is critical to understand that the narratives of Genesis are set within the broader context of the Ancient Near East during the patriarchal period (approximately 2000-1500 BC). The use of surrogates or secondary wives to bear children was a well-established practice among the nations and cultures of this era. Evidence from sources like the Nuzi tablets, Hittite laws, and other ancient texts confirms that it was not uncommon for a wife who could not conceive to provide her husband with a servant or slave woman for the purposes of procreation and securing an heir.
The Cultural Context
The concept of the Maidservants acting as a surrogate was embedded within the patriarchal and patrilineal structure of Ancient Near Eastern societies. A key aspect of these cultures was the importance placed on male offspring to carry on the family lineage and inherit property. A wife's primary duty was to produce legitimate male heirs for her husband. If she failed in this role due to barrenness or other factors, serious social and economic consequences could result. The practice of utilizing a surrogate from the wife's servants or slaves was seen as an accepted solution to ensure the continuation of the family line.
It is within this cultural milieu that the Genesis accounts of the patriarchs and their wives must be understood. The narratives are not promoting or condemning the practice per se, but rather presenting it as a reality of the time period in which the events took place. As Old Testament scholar Gordon Wenham states, "The family problems encountered by the patriarchs represent the outworking of God's purposes in the cultural context of their day."
The Ethnicities of Bilhah and Zilpah
The Genesis account does not explicitly state the ethnic or national origins of Bilhah and Zilpah. However, there are some clues that can be reasonably inferred from the text and the broader ancient Near Eastern context.
Regarding Bilhah, Genesis 29:29 notes that after Laban gave his daughter Rachel to Jacob as a wife, "Laban gave his female servant Bilhah to his daughter Rachel to be her servant." This implies that Bilhah was likely acquired or came from Laban's own household in Paddan-aram (northwestern Mesopotamia). She may have been of Aramean descent, or potentially from another ethnic group under Laban's ownership.
For Zilpah, the text is even more ambiguous about her origins, simply stating in Genesis 29:24 that "Laban gave his female servant Zilpah to his daughter Leah to be her servant." This could suggest Zilpah was ethnically Aramean like Bilhah, or potentially from Canaan where Jacob's family had resided before sojourning to Paddan-aram.
Given the prevalent practices of the time, it was common for wealthy patriarchal households to acquire female servants from foreign lands through trade, purchase, or as spoils of war and conflicts. So Bilhah and Zilpah may have represented diverse ethnic backgrounds absorbed into the families of Laban and Jacob.
Legal Status as Maidservants
In the ancient Near East, the legal status of Maidservants or female servants was a complex intersection of slavery, second-class citizenship, and their connection to their owner's household. On one level, Bilhah and Zilpah were essentially slaves owned by their respective mistresses Rachel and Leah. This was a common reality throughout the patriarchal period and neighboring societies like Nuzi.
However, their positions within the household structure afforded them slightly more privileges and legal recognition than chattel slaves. As "Maidservants" directly attached to the principal wives, they occupied trused roles managing the family's domestic affairs and serving their mistresses' interests.
This can be seen in how both Bilhah (Genesis 30:3) and Zilpah (Genesis 30:9) are referred to as being "given" by Rachel and Leah to Jacob as "wives," using the Hebrew term "ishshah." While not elevating them to full wife status, this language signifies their surrogates roles bore a level of sanctioned legality rooted in ancient practice.
The legal codes of societies like Nuzi granted surrogates a protected status, with the children being recognized as legitimate heirs. Given the parallels to these conventions in the Genesis accounts, Bilhah and Zilpah likely occupied a legally recognized position as secondary wives for reproductive purposes, while still remaining bound as servants to Rachel and Leah respectively.
Practical Realities in the Patriarchal Household
From a practical standpoint, the day-to-day experiences of Bilhah and Zilpah were no doubt filled with immense challenges. As Genesis 30 vividly portrays, their roles as surrogates thrust them into an extremely tense, rivalry-fueled family dynamic between the wives Rachel and Leah who were competing for status and children. A woman at this time in Israel would have had nearly two pregnancies for every child that survived to the age of five.
After giving birth to Dan and Naphtali through the surrogate Bilhah, Rachel proudly declares "With mighty wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister and have prevailed" (Genesis 30:8). This indicates the intense pressure and one-upmanship Bilhah likely faced as the object of Rachel's struggle against her sister Leah for offspring.
Similarly, Zilpah's two sons Gad and Asher represented a hard-won victory for Leah, who proclaimed "How fortunate!" and "With my fortunes!" after each birth (Genesis 30:11,13). As merely servants and child-bearers, Bilhah and Zilpah were essentially pawns caught in the middle of this heated sibling rivalry over producing heirs for Jacob.
Their living conditions were also likely very difficult. As propertyless servants, they occupied a low social position with minimal rights or autonomy. While part of the patriarchal household, they were ultimately still slaves subject to the authority and at the mercy of their mistresses Leah and Rachel.
This reality is hinted at in Genesis 30:3 where Rachel offers Bilhah to Jacob, stating "Behold my servant Bilhah...that even I may have children through her." Rachel's wording of "even I may have children through her" carries an undercurrent of ownership and using Bilhah as a reproductive instrument for Rachel's own interests.
The challenges faced by Bilhah and Zilpah also extended into their relationships with Jacob after bearing him children. The numerous references to "going into" the Maidservants (e.g. Genesis 30:4,9) suggests a transactional, non-romantic element to these sexual unions solely for the purpose of producing offspring per the wives' instructions.
Given the domestic friction and rivalry between the wives, it is unlikely Bilhah and Zilpah enjoyed any elevated respect or tender treatment after fulfilling their surrogacy role. Though granted a degree of legal protection, their practical existence remained one of servitude and potential mistreatment within the volatile patriarchal family structure.
This backdrop emphasizes the immense vulnerabilities and hardships endured by these two women who were thrust into deeply complicated marital circumstances simply as a means to an end, providing children and heirs in a culture obsessed with patrilineal succession. While the Genesis text does not overtly condemn this practice, the sobering realities of Bilhah and Zilpah's ethnic identities, legal ambiguities, and challenging domestic situations shine a light on the complex world of the ancient Israelite household.
Abram, Sarai, and Hagar (Genesis 16:1-3)
The first instance of this practice arises in Genesis 16 with Abram (later renamed Abraham), Sarai (later Sarai), and Hagar the Egyptian servant. The passage reads:
"Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children. She had a female Egyptian servant whose name was Hagar. And Sarai said to Abram, "Behold now, the Lord has prevented me from bearing children. Go in to my servant; it may be that I shall obtain children by her." And Abram listened to the voice of Sarai." (Genesis 16:1-2 ESV).
Sarai, being unable to conceive children herself, offers her Egyptian maidservants Hagar to Abram as a surrogate wife. This was a culturally accepted solution rooted in ancient practice. Sarai likely hoped that through Hagar, she could obtain offspring that would be reckoned as her own and secure an heir for Abram's lineage. The text notes that "Abram listened to the voice of Sarai," indicating his consent and adherence to this socially normative arrangement.
This narrative sets up one of the central tensions and trials that Abraham and Sarah would face in their journey of faith – the conflict between attempting to secure the promised offspring through human efforts versus relying on God's timing and miraculous provision. While Sarai rationalized her actions as a means to "obtain children" and further God's promise to Abram of becoming a great nation (Genesis 12:2), the resulting family strife and Hagar's mistreatment revealed the flaws of this approach apart from complete trust in the Lord.
Jacob, Leah, Rachel, Bilhah, and Zilpah (Genesis 29:31-30:24)
The second major instance where the cultural practice of surrogacy is depicted is found in the account of Jacob's marriage to Leah and Rachel, and their respective maidservants Bilhah and Zilpah. This complex family dynamic is detailed in Genesis 29:31-30:24.
The narrative begins with the Lord enabling Leah, the wife whom Jacob did not love as much as Rachel, to bear children while Rachel remained barren. After giving birth to four sons, the rivalry between the sisters intensifies:
"When Rachel saw that she bore Jacob no children, she envied her sister. She said to Jacob, "Give me children, or I shall die!" Jacob's anger was kindled against Rachel, and he said, "Am I in the place of God, who has withheld from you the fruit of the womb?" (Genesis 30:1-2 ESV).
Rachel's desperation and Jacob's pointed response highlight the immense cultural pressure and personal anguish surrounding barrenness. Like her foremother Sarai, Rachel opts to give her servant Bilhah to Jacob as a wife, stating: "Behold my servant Bilhah; go in to her, so that she may give birth on my behalf, that even I may have children through her." (Genesis 30:3 ESV).
Bilhah bears two sons, who are explicitly regarded as Rachel's children due to the surrogate arrangement (Genesis 30:6, 8). Not to be outdone, Leah follows suit when she perceives herself as having ceased bearing children for Jacob:
"When Leah saw that she had ceased bearing children, she took her servant Zilpah and gave her to Jacob as a wife. Then Leah's servant Zilpah bore Jacob a son...Afterward Zilpah bore Jacob a second son." (Genesis 30:9-12 ESV).
The two surrogate mothers, acting on behalf of the struggling wives Rachel and Leah, give birth to four children who are counted as offspring of the wives themselves. This intricate situation exemplifies the widespread practice of surrogate motherhood through the provision of maidservants at that time in Ancient Near Eastern culture.
Significantly, the scripture makes no moral judgment on the validity or ethical nature of this arrangement. The narrative simply presents the events as they occurred, with the focus being on God's sovereign oversight in opening and closing wombs according to His purposes (Genesis 29:31, 30:22). The family tensions, envies, and strained relationships that resulted from this polygamous situation are portrayed vividly and honestly, highlighting the complex human reality that arose from attempts to take matters of childbearing into one's own hands.
Theological Significance and Connections to the Ancient Near East
While the Biblical text does not explicitly condone or condemn the practice of using surrogates, it is clear that these narratives challenge incorrect assumptions about marriage, childbearing, and the nature of God's covenant promises. The repeated failings, anxieties, and sinful behaviors that stemmed from relying on human means to secure offspring stand in stark contrast to the obedience and faith modeled later by Abraham and Sarah in awaiting God's timing for the child of promise, Isaac.
From a theological perspective, these accounts serve as reminders that God's purposes cannot be forced through human impatience or manipulation. The road to fulfilling His covenant often involves suffering, waiting, and complete reliance on His sovereign will and timing. Abraham and Sarah's experiences teach that God's promises are to be embraced by faith, not attempted shortcuts rooted in lack of trust.
The sin was not in the cultural practice itself, as that was an accepted norm of the ancient world, but rather in the underlying motivations of the heart that sought to usurp God's role as the giver and opener of wombs (Genesis 20:18, 29:31, 30:22). The use of servants as surrogates is presented neutrally as a fact of Ancient Near Eastern life, with the emphasis being on the character's responses to barrenness and God's involvement in their circumstances.
It is also striking to note the numerous linguistic and narrative parallels between the Genesis accounts of the patriarchs utilizing servant wives/surrogates and similar practices found in ancient extrabiblical sources like the Nuzi texts. For example, the Nuzi custom of a childless wife being able to give her personal maid to her husband as a secondary wife bears uncanny resemblance to the Hagar and Bilhah narratives. The children born from such unions were considered offspring of the wife herself.
Patriarchal Surrogacy in Light of the Nuzi Texts
The Biblical narratives surrounding the practice of utilizing servant women as surrogates or secondary wives by the Israelite patriarchs Abraham, Jacob, and their wives have long captivated scholars and readers alike. The accounts of Sarai offering Hagar to Abram (Genesis 16), and Leah and Rachel giving Bilhah and Zilpah respectively to Jacob (Genesis 29-30), appear to depict a cultural norm foreign to modern Western sensibilities. However, an examination of archaeological evidence from the Ancient Near East sheds critical light on the background and societal context of these events.
Among the most illuminating discoveries are the Nuzi texts, a cache of clay tablets uncovered at the royal palace archives of the ancient Nuzi settlement, located in modern-day Iraq. These texts, dating to around 1500-1350 BC, provide invaluable insight into the cultural milieu and legal customs of the Hurrian population that inhabited the region during the patriarchal period of the Old Testament. Strikingly, the Nuzi records reveal numerous parallels and common practices related to marriage, surrogate motherhood, and inheritance laws that closely mirror the situations described in the book of Genesis. This evidence strongly suggests that the authors of Genesis were presenting events as they occurred within the established societal norms and traditions of their Ancient Near Eastern setting.
Who Were the Nuzis?
The Nuzis were a Hurrian people who established a significant kingdom centered around their capital city of Nuzi (also known as Yorgan Tepe), strategically located along trade routes in northern Mesopotamia. Their civilization flourished from around the 15th to the 14th century BC, contemporaneous with the later years of the patriarchal narratives in Genesis.
Archaeologists have uncovered a vast wealth of cuneiform tablets and other artifacts that shed light on various aspects of Nuzi culture, including laws, customs, religious practices, and economic activities. Of particular relevance are the extensive legal records detailing marriage contracts, inheritance rights, and regulations surrounding childless wives, concubines, and surrogate motherhood.
While the Nuzis were not Israelites and their religious beliefs differed from the monotheistic faith of the patriarchs, the striking parallels in social conventions regarding family structure, patrilineal descent, and legal provisions for ensuring offspring underscore the shared cultural context of the Ancient Near East during this era. As Old Testament scholar Victor P. Hamilton notes, "The patriarchal narratives present a domestic scene that is more at home at Nuzi than in most modern Western settings."
The Nuzi Practice of Surrogate Motherhood
One of the most well-attested practices found in the Nuzi texts is the provision for a husband to take a secondary wife or concubine in the event that his primary wife was childless. This secondary wife, often a servant or slave within the household, would then bear children who were legally reckoned as offspring of the primary wife.
The clearest example comes from the Nuzi marriage tablet, which outlines the contractual obligations and contingencies related to marriage and childbearing. A key clause states:
"If Gilimninu does not have children, she shall take a female slave (gemirtum) from wherever she wishes as her adopted daughter. Gilimninu shall have authority over the female slave, whom she brought into the household. The children whom the slave woman bears shall be Gilimninu's children" (Nuzi Tablet HS 19).
This legal provision bears a striking resemblance to the situations described in Genesis 16 and Genesis 30, where the barren wives Sarai and Rachel provide their maidservants Hagar and Bilhah respectively to their husbands Abram and Jacob. The resulting children were considered the legal offspring of the wives themselves.
In Genesis 16:2, Sarai states to Abram, "Behold now, the Lord has prevented me from bearing children. Go in to my servant; it may be that I shall obtain children by her." Similarly, in Genesis 30:3, Rachel declares to Jacob, "Behold my servant Bilhah; go in to her, so that she may give birth on my behalf, that even I may have children through her."
The language used, such as "obtain children" and "have children through her," directly mirrors the legal phrasing found in the Nuzi marriage contracts. This provides strong evidence that the author of Genesis was conveying events according to the well-established cultural norms and practices of the Ancient Near East during the patriarchal period.
Furthermore, the Nuzi texts outline specific legal provisions related to inheritance rights and the status of children born to surrogate or secondary wives. In one tablet, it is stated that "the sons of the slavewife shall be heir sons just like the sons of the primary wife. These sons shall receive an inheritance share from the paternal estate" (Nuzi Tablet LS 28).
This inheritance law aligns with the Biblical accounts, wherein the children born to Bilhah and Zilpah were treated as full heirs and received equal shares alongside the sons of Leah and Rachel. As Genesis 30:7-8 records, "And she [Rachel's servant Bilhah] conceived and bore Jacob a son...Rachel said, 'With mighty wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister and have prevailed.' So she called his name Naphtali."
By bestowing the name "Naphtali" meaning "my struggle" or "wrestlings," Rachel was claiming the son born to Bilhah as her own, in keeping with the Nuzi tradition of surrogate children being legally recognized as offspring of the primary wife.
This legal parallel is further reinforced in Genesis 35:22-26, where all twelve sons of Jacob are listed together without distinction as to whether they were born from the wives Leah and Rachel or their servants Bilhah and Zilpah. The text states, "The sons of Jacob were twelve...the sons of Rachel: Joseph and Benjamin. The sons of Bilhah, Rachel's servant: Dan and Naphtali...The sons of Zilpah, Leah's servant: Gad and Asher."
Influence on Ancient Israelite Marital Practices
While the Israelites were undoubtedly set apart from their pagan neighbors through their covenantal relationship with Yahweh and the unique laws and customs revealed in the Mosaic Law, it is evident that many social and marital norms were shared across Ancient Near Eastern societies during the patriarchal period.
Given the extensive documentation of surrogate motherhood and secondary wife practices in cultures like the Nuzis, it is highly likely that the Israelite matriarchs Sarai, Leah, and Rachel would have been familiar with and influenced by these widespread traditions of their day. As residents of Mesopotamia and Canaan respectively, they inhabited regions where such marital customs were legally codified and socially accepted.
The narratives in Genesis depict the wives' actions - offering personal servants as surrogate mothers to their husbands - as proceeding without objection or moral censure. This implies that the practice, while not directly prescribed or advocated by God's covenant, was tolerated and even expected as a pragmatic solution in cases of barrenness.
After all, bearing children, particularly sons to continue the family line, was of paramount importance in the patriarchal, patrilineal culture. A wife's inability to produce offspring could be grounds for divorce or the taking of additional wives (as was the case with the multiple marriages of the patriarchs). Providing a surrogate allowed the barren wife to satisfy this fundamental duty and societal expectation.
From the perspective of Sarai, Leah, and Rachel, invoking the accepted custom of using a servant as a surrogate may have been viewed as the best available option to overcome their barrenness while still producing children reckoned as their own within the marital structure.As Victor Hamilton explains, "For an Israelite wife to be childless was to bear something of a stigma and possibly risk the introduction of another wife."
This cultural backdrop sheds light on the tension and family conflicts that arose from these arrangements, as seen in the domestic dramas and rivalries between the wives and their surrogates described so vividly in Genesis 16 and Genesis 30. While not explicitly promoting surrogacy, the text presents these events honestly and without condemnation, allowing the narratives to unfold according to the complex realities of that ancient world.
Theological Significance
From a theological perspective, the presence of these surrogate practices in the patriarchal narratives serves several profound purposes within the overarching story of God's covenant relationship with Israel.
Firstly, it reinforces the idea that the accounts of Genesis are grounded in the historical and cultural realities of the Ancient Near East. The parallels with practices attested in sources like the Nuzi texts demonstrate that the Biblical authors were not presenting the patriarchal stories through an anachronistic modern lens, but authentically depicting events as they occurred within their original context. As Gordon Wenham states, "The problems met by the patriarchs are typical of those found in secular documents of their time and milieu."
This lends credibility and reliability to the Genesis narratives as being firmly rooted in the societal norms and legal traditions of that era, rather than being mere fictionalized tales or allegories. The fact that such culturally specific practices are presented matter-of-factly, without explicit condemnation or endorsement, argues for the historical authenticity of these accounts.
Secondly, the inclusion of these surrogate narratives highlights a crucial theological truth, that God's sovereign purposes are ultimately fulfilled not through human schemes or culturally accepted practices, but through His miraculous power and perfect timing. While the patriarchs and matriarchs attempted to secure offspring through socially normative means like surrogacy, the culmination of God's covenant promises came about through supernatural intervention.
The birth of Isaac to the aged Sarah (Genesis 21:1-7) and the miraculous births of the twelve tribal progenitors (Genesis 29:31-30:24, 35:16-20) stand as powerful testaments that it was the Lord alone who "opened the womb" in defiance of natural circumstances. As Genesis 25:21 declares regarding Isaac's conception, "and the Lord granted his prayer, and Rebekah his wife conceived."
This underscores the central theological message that God's covenant blessings cannot be grasped or guaranteed through human strength, wisdom, or adherence to cultural norms. Rather, they are bestowed by God's grace and perfect timing, often in ways that defy human logic or expectations.
The surrogate passages serve as a sobering prelude to this truth, depicting the futility and turmoil that arises when the patriarchs and matriarchs attempt to bring about the promised offspring through their own efforts, rather than patiently relying on God's provision. The family conflicts, jealousies, and discord that plague the households of Abraham and Jacob due to these surrogate arrangements foreshadow the greater need for complete trust and obedience to the divine plan.
In this sense, the presence of these Ancient Near Eastern practices within the Biblical text allows the narratives to honestly confront the realities and temptations faced by God's people throughout the ages - the tendency to take matters into their own hands, succumbing to impatience, culture pressures, or flawed human wisdom when God's promises seem unfulfilled. The surrogacy accounts serve as a stark reminder that such attempts at self-reliance ultimately breed strife, suffering, and a lack of faith in the Almighty's perfect purposes.
Finally, an exploration of the surrogate wife practices illuminates the progressive revelation and refinement of God's design for marriage, sexuality, and family structures throughout the Biblical narrative. While the customs described in Genesis 16 and 30 were culturally normative in the Ancient Near East, later portions of Scripture provide a clearer delineation of God's ideals for marriage.
For example, the Mosaic Law outlines legislation regulating marital relations, prohibiting incest, defining appropriate partners, and establishing laws related to female servants, concubines, and offspring (Leviticus 18, Deuteronomy 21). Although not explicitly banning surrogate arrangements, these statutes begin to shape a more defined, ethical structure for marriage centered on monogamous unions between a man and a woman.
This trajectory continues into the New Testament, where Jesus himself upholds the original design for marriage as being between one man and one woman (Matthew 19:4-6), while Paul exhorts believers to maintain marital fidelity and purity (Ephesians 5:22-33, 1 Corinthians 7). The stark polygamous realities depicted in the Genesis narratives stand in contrast to these later ideals for Christ-centered marriages centered on mutual love, respect, and covenant commitment between husband and wife.
In this sense, the ancient practice of surrogate motherhood, though presented descriptively in Genesis, represents an "already but not yet" motif, an accepted cultural norm that persisted during the patriarchal period, but would eventually give way to God's full revelation of His design for marriage as a sacred, monogamous union. The presence of these surrogacy accounts allows the Biblical narrative to honestly grapple with and portray the harsh realities and pragmatic choices faced by God's people throughout different eras, while progressively elevating the divine ideals for marriage, family, and sexual ethics over time.
Conclusion
An in-depth examination of the surrogate wife narratives in Genesis, viewed through the lens of ancient extrabiblical texts like the Nuzi records, yields profound insights into the historical, cultural, and theological significance of these passages. The striking parallels between the Biblical accounts and the documented legal norms of the Ancient Near East regarding practices like surrogate motherhood provide a revelatory glimpse into the societal context in which the patriarchal stories unfolded.
Rather than depicting the surrogate arrangements as aberrant or unique occurrences, the matter-of-fact presentation of these events in Genesis argues for their status as conventionally accepted customs during that era. The use of linguistic terminology and legal provisions that directly mirror contemporaneous sources like the Nuzi tablets lends remarkable credence to the historical authenticity and reliability of the Biblical narratives.
For the Israelite matriarchs Sarah, Rebekah, Leah, and Rachel, the practice of providing a servant or maidservant as a surrogate wife to one's husband would have likely been viewed as a pragmatic, if unfortunate, solution to the immense cultural shame and marital insecurity associated with barrenness. The accounts honestly grapple with the complex family dynamics, jealousies, and conflicts that inevitably arose from these polygamous arrangements.
Yet at the same time, the inclusion of these surrogate narratives within the Biblical canon serves vital theological purposes that reverberate throughout the overarching story of God's covenant relationship with His people. They poignantly illustrate the futility of seeking to bring about God's promises through human strength, wisdom, or cultural pragmatism apart from faith and obedience to His sovereign timing.
The suffering, strife, and spiritual shortcomings exemplified in the households of Abraham and Jacob due to the surrogate arrangements contrast starkly with the miraculous births of Isaac, the twelve patriarchs, and ultimately the messianic lineage leading to Christ - all of which came about through divine intervention that transcended natural limitations.
In this sense, the ancient practice of surrogate motherhood, though initially depicted as a cultural norm, gradually gives way throughout the Biblical narrative to a refining and elevating of God's designed order for marriage, sexuality, and family structures. The Genesis accounts represent an important starting point in this revelatory progression, confronting the harsh pragmatism necessitated by a fallen world while simultaneously pointing towards the greater reality of God's covenant promises being fulfilled not through human methods, but through supernatural grace, provision, and obedience to His will.
Ultimately, an exploration of the surrogate wife theme allows readers to wrestle with profound truths about faith, patience, cultural influences, and God's redemptive purposes in a deeply authentic fashion - all while providing a vital historical foundation for understanding the lives and complex realities faced by the patriarchs and matriarchs of ancient Israel..
No comments:
Post a Comment